SQL中 count(*)和count(1)的对比，区别

执行效率上：  
列名为主键，count(列名)会比count(1)快  
列名不为主键，count(1)会比count(列名)快  
如果表多个列并且没有主键，则 count（1） 的执行效率优于 count（*）  
如果有主键，则 select count（主键）的执行效率是最优的  
如果表只有一个字段，则 select count（*）最优。
转自：http://eeeewwwqq.iteye.com/blog/1972576

实例分析

mysql> create table counttest(name char(1), age char(2));
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.03 sec)

mysql> insert into counttest values
-> (‘a‘, ‘14‘),(‘a‘, ‘15‘), (‘a‘, ‘15‘),
-> (‘b‘, NULL), (‘b‘, ‘16‘),
-> (‘c‘, ‘17‘),
-> (‘d‘, null),
->(‘e‘, ‘‘);
Query OK, 8 rows affected (0.01 sec)
Records: 8 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0

mysql> select * from counttest;
+------+------+
| name | age |
+------+------+
| a | 14 |
| a | 15 |
| a | 15 |
| b | NULL |
| b | 16 |
| c | 17 |
| d | NULL |
| e | |
+------+------+
8 rows in set (0.00 sec)

mysql> select name, count(name), count(1), count(*), count(age), count(distinct(age))
-> from counttest
-> group by name;
+------+-------------+----------+----------+------------+----------------------+
| name | count(name) | count(1) | count(*) | count(age) | count(distinct(age)) |
+------+-------------+----------+----------+------------+----------------------+
| a | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| b | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| c | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| d | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| e | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
+------+-------------+----------+----------+------------+----------------------+
5 rows in set (0.00 sec)

额外参考资料：http://blog.csdn.net/lihuarongaini/article/details/68485838

SQL中 count(*)和count(1)的对比，区别

标签：sdn   net   多少   name   com   set   rom   sel   group